Abu Hatim al-Razi: His hadith is written down.
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Basti: He makes mistakes, his hadith is considered weak if it is below the level of trustworthy narrators.
Abu Hafs Umar ibn Shahin: Trustworthy
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: Trustworthy
Abu Zar'ah al-Razi: He is alright.
Abu Mishar al-Ghassani: Weak in hadith
Abu Nuaym al-Fadl ibn Dukin: Trustworthy
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: He is not among the people of memorization and precision.
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasai: He is alright.
Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani: Truthful, he makes mistakes, and once: It has not been proven that Ahmad weakened him, and he only has one hadith in Bukhari as a follower.
Al-Dhahabi: Trustworthy
Abd al-A'la ibn Mishar al-Ghassani: He weakened him.
Ali ibn al-Madini: He was firm and trustworthy, and the trustworthy Ibn Abi Dhuayb and others narrated from him.
Muhammad ibn Umar al-Mawsili: Trustworthy, there is no disagreement among people about him.
Authors of Tahrir Taqrib al-Tahdhib: Trustworthy, a group declared his authentication, and the two Sheikhs relied on him in their Sahihs. Only Abu Mishaar weakened him, and what al-Khattabi narrated from Ahmad ibn Hanbal that he declared his authentication is not correct, and it is a rejected criticism because it is not explained.
Yahya ibn Ma'in: Trustworthy, and once: He is alright, and once: Trustworthy, he is alright, and once: Firm