Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: Discredited, and he has narrations from a group of trustworthy narrators that are not preserved
Abu Ja'far al-'Uqayli: His hadith is not preserved and he is only known by it
Abu Hatim al-Razi: Weak in hadith, very discredited in hadith, his hadith is written with consideration
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Basti: Among those who narrate fabricated reports from famous narrators, so when he narrated more than what resembles the hadith of confirmation, he did not deserve to be included among the trustworthy narrators, so he was mostly known for poetry and literature rather than knowledge
Abu Zur'a al-Razi: He refused to read his hadith and abandoned narrating from him
Abu Isa al-Tirmidhi: Weak
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: He did not write anything from him
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasa'i: Abandoned in hadith, and once: His hadith is not to be written
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Abandoned, his books were burned, so he narrated from his memory, so his mistakes increased, and he was knowledgeable in genealogy
Al-Daraqutni: Weak, and he mentioned him once in the book of Sunan and said: He is not strong
Al-Dhahabi: They abandoned him
Ali ibn al-Husayn ibn Hibban: I found in my brother's book in his handwriting: Abu Zakariya ibn Abi Thabit al-'Arj al-Madani, I have seen him here in Baghdad, he used to insult people and attack their lineages, his hadith is nothing
Umar ibn Shabbah al-Numayri: Many mistakes in his hadith, because his books were burned, so he used to narrate from his memory
Muhammad ibn Isma'il al-Bukhari: Discredited in hadith, his hadith is not to be written
Muhammad ibn Yahya al-Naysaburi: He used to consider him very weak
Yahya ibn Ma'in: A man of lineage, he was not from the people of hadith, and once: He is not trustworthy, he was only a man of poetry, and once: His hadith is nothing