About the life of the narrator


Name: Abdullah ibn Lahi'ah ibn Aqabah ibn Fir'awn ibn Rabi'ah ibn Thawban
Fame: Abdullah ibn Lahi'ah Al-Hadrami
Kuniya: Abu Abdullah, Abu Abdur Rahman
Lineage: Al-'Iduli, Al-Ghafiqi, Al-Hadrami, Al-Misri
Occupation: Judge, Judge of Egypt, Faqih (Islamic Jurist)
Rank: Weak in Hadith
Lived in: Hadramaut, Egypt
Born Year: 97
Died Year: 174

عن حياة الراوي


الأسم: عبد الله بن لهيعة بن عقبة بن فرعان بن ربيعة بن ثوبان
الشهرة: عبد الله بن لهيعة الحضرمي
الكنيه: أبو عبد الله, أبو عبد الرحمن
النسب: الأعدولي, الغافقي, الحضرمي, المصري
الوظيفة: القاضي قاضي مصر, الفقيه
الرتبة: ضعيف الحديث
عاش في: حضرموت, مصر
ولد عام: 97
توفي عام: 174

Scholars Praise/criticism of the Narrator


Abu Ahmad Al-Hakim: His Hadith is rejected
Abu Ahmad ibn 'Adi Al-Jurjani: His Hadith is as if it were forgotten, and he is among those whose Hadith is written down
Abu Al-Qasim ibn Bashkuwal: He became confused. What was narrated from him before his confusion is acceptable. He was prone to making mistakes and errors before his confusion, and his books were burned
Abu Bakr Al-Bayhaqi: He is not used as an evidence. He once said: The Hadith scholars have agreed upon his weakness
Abu Hatim Ar-Razi: Weak, and his case is confusing. His Hadith is written for consideration. He once said: Acceptable
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban Al-Busti: He practices Tadlis (concealing the chain of narrators) from weak narrators to trustworthy narrators whom he met. He would then not mind what was presented to him to read, whether it was from his narration or not. He mentioned him among the trustworthy narrators
Abu Hafs 'Umar ibn Shahin: Trustworthy
Abu Zur'ah Ar-Razi: Weak, and his case is confusing. His Hadith is written for consideration. He was not precise. When he was asked about hearing from the elders from him, he said: His later and earlier narrations are the same, except that Ibn Al-Mubarak and Ibn Wahb used to follow his origins and write from him
Abu 'Abdullah Al-Hakim An-Naysaburi: He did not intend to lie, but he narrated from his memory after his books were burned, so he made mistakes
Abu 'Isa At-Tirmidhi: Weak according to the Hadith scholars. Yahya ibn Sa'id weakened him due to his memory
Ahmad ibn Abi Al-'Awwam Al-Misri: He held the position of Judge of Egypt for ten years, starting in the year 154 AH
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: His Hadith is not considered evidence. He once said: Who is like Ibn Lahi'ah in Egypt in terms of the abundance of his Hadith, his memorization, and his piety?
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb An-Nasa'i: Weak, not trustworthy. He once said: I have not included any Hadith from him except for one Hadith
Ahmad ibn Salih Al-Misri: Among the trustworthy narrators, except that if he came across something, he would narrate it
Ibrahim ibn Ya'qub Al-Jawzajani: One should not stop at his Hadith, nor should one rely on it or be deceived by his narration
Ibn Hajar Al-'Asqalani: Truthful, but became confused after his books were burned. The narrations of Ibn Al-Mubarak and Ibn Wahb from him are more reliable than others
Ibn Qutaybah Ad-Dinawari: Things that were not his Hadith were read to him
Al-Khatib Al-Baghdadi: There were many mistakes in his narration due to his leniency
Ad-Daraqutni: What is considered is what the reliable narrators narrate from him: Ibn Al-Mubarak, Al-Maqri (Ibn Wahb), and Ibn Wahb. He once said: His Hadith is weak. He once said: His Hadith is not used as an evidence. He once said: He is not strong
Adh-Dhahabi: The work is on weakening his Hadith
An-Nadr ibn 'Abd Al-Jabbar: Ibn Lahi'ah did not become confused until he died
Bishr ibn Al-Sari Al-Basri: If I had seen Ibn Lahi'ah, I would not have taken a single letter from him
Abdur Rahman ibn Mahdi: I did not consider anything I heard of his Hadith. He once said: I do not take from him, whether little or much
Abdur Rahman ibn Yusuf ibn Kharash: His Hadith is written down
Abdullah ibn Al-Mubarak Al-Marwazi: Ibn Lahi'ah has become exposed
Abdullah ibn Wahb Al-Misri: The truthful, the righteous
Amr ibn 'Ali Al-Fallas: Weak in Hadith. His books were burned. Those who wrote from him before that, such as Ibn Al-Mubarak and Abdullah ibn Yazid Al-Maqri, are more reliable than those who wrote after the books were burned
Muhammad ibn Ishaq ibn Khuzaymah: I am not among those who narrate his Hadith if it is narrated by him alone. He once mentioned him in Tawheed, saying that Ibn Lahi'ah is not among our condition of those whose Hadith is used as an evidence
Muhammad ibn Isma'il Al-Bukhari: Yahya ibn Sa'id used to say: He did not see anything (wrong with him). His books were burned in the year 170 AH
Muhammad ibn Jarir At-Tabari: His mind became confused at the end of his life
Muhammad ibn Sa'd, the scribe of Al-Waqidi: Weak
Authors of Tahrir Taqrib At-Tahdhib: Weak, his Hadith is written for consideration
Yahya ibn Hassan At-Tinnisi: I have not seen anyone with a better memory than Ibn Lahi'ah after Hushaym. It was said to him: People say that Ibn Lahi'ah's books were burned. He said: He did not lose a single book
Yahya ibn Sa'id Al-Qattan: Bishr ibn Al-Sari told me: If I had seen Ibn Lahi'ah, I would not have taken a single letter from him
Yahya ibn 'Abdullah ibn Bakir: The house of Ibn Lahi'ah and his books were burned in the year 170 AH
Yahya ibn Ma'in: What he narrated before his books were burned is written down. He once said: Weak in Hadith, his Hadith is not used as an evidence. He once said: All of his Hadiths are not reliable, his Hadith is not that strong. He once said: Weak in all of his Hadiths, not just some of them. He once said: Abu Al-Aswad, who was trustworthy, said: Ibn Lahi'ah never became confused until he died

مدح/انتقاد العلماء للراوي


أبو أحمد الحاكم: ذاهب الحديث
أبو أحمد بن عدي الجرجاني: حديثه كأنه نسيئ، وهو ممن يكتب حديثه
أبو القاسم بن بشكوال: اختلط، فمن روى عنه قبل الاختلاط فلا بأس به، وكان قبل الاختلاط كثير الوهم، كثير الخطأ، واحترقت كتبه
أبو بكر البيهقي: لا يحتج به، وقال مرة: أجمع أصحاب الحديث على تضعيفه
أبو حاتم الرازي: ضعيف، وأمره مضطرب، يكتب حديثه للاعتبار، وقال مره: صالح
أبو حاتم بن حبان البستي: يدلس عن أقوام ضعفاء على أقوام ثقات قد رآهم ثم كان لا يبالى ما دفع إليه قرأه سواء كان من حديثه أو لم يكن، وذكره في الثقات
أبو حفص عمر بن شاهين: ثقة
أبو زرعة الرازي: ضعيف، وأمره مضطرب يكتب حديثه على الاعتبار، وكان لا يضبط، ولما سئل عن سماع القدماء منه؟ فقال: أخره وأوله سواد إلا أن ابن المبارك وابن وهب كانا يتتبعان أصوله فيكتبان منه
أبو عبد الله الحاكم النيسابوري: لم يقصد الكذب وإنما حدث من حفظه بعد احتراق كتبه فأخطأ
أبو عيسى الترمذي: ضعيف عند أهل الحديث ضعفه يحيى بن سعيد من قبل حفظه
أحمد بن أبي العوام المصري: ولي قضاء مصر عشر سنين، أولها سنة أربع وخمسين ومائة
أحمد بن حنبل: حديثه ليس بحجة، ومرة: من كان مثل ابن لهيعة بمصر في كثرة حديثه وضبطه وإتقانه
أحمد بن شعيب النسائي: ضعيف، ليس بثقة، ومرة: ما أخرجت من حديثه إلا حديثا واحدا
أحمد بن صالح المصري: من الثقات إلا أنه إذا لقن شيئا حدث به
إبراهيم بن يعقوب الجوزجاني: لا يوقف على حديثه ولا ينبغى أن يحتج به ولا يغتر بروايته
ابن حجر العسقلاني: صدوق، خلط بعد احتراق كتبه، ورواية ابن المبارك وابن وهب عنه أعدل من غيرهما
ابن قتيبة الدينوري: كان يقرأ عليه ما ليس من حديثه
الخطيب البغدادي: كثرت المناكير في روايته لتساهله
الدارقطني: يعتبر بما يروي عنه العبادلة: ابن المبارك والمقرىء وابن وهب، ومرة قال: يضعف حديثه، ومرة: لا يحتج بحديثه، ومرة: ليس بالقوي
الذهبي: العمل على تضعيف حديثه
النضر بن عبد الجبار: ما اختلط ابن لهيعة قط حتى مات
بشر بن السري البصري: لو رأيت بن لهيعة لم تحمل عنه حرفا
عبد الرحمن بن مهدي: ما اعتد بشيء سمعته من حديثه، ومرة: لا أحمل عنه قليلا ولا كثيرا
عبد الرحمن بن يوسف بن خراش: يكتب حديثه
عبد الله بن المبارك المروزي: قد أراب ابن لهيعة أي ظهرت عورته
عبد الله بن وهب المصري: الصادق البار
عمرو بن علي الفلاس: ضعيف الحديث، احترقت كتبه، فمن كتب عنه قبل ذلك مثل ابن المبارك وعبد الله بن يزيد المقرى أصح من الذين كتبوا بعدما احترقت الكتب
محمد بن إسحاق بن خزيمة: لست ممن أخرج حديثه إذا انفرد، ومرة ذكره في التوحيد ليس ابن لهيعة من شرطنا ممن يحتج به
محمد بن إسماعيل البخاري: كان يحيى بن سعيد، كان لا يراه شيئا، واحترقت كتبه في سنة سبعين ومائة
محمد بن جرير الطبري: اختلط عقله في آخر عمره
محمد بن سعد كاتب الواقدي: ضعيف
مصنفوا تحرير تقريب التهذيب: ضعيف، يكتب حديثه للاعتبار
يحيى بن حسان التنيسي: ما رأيت أحفظ من ابن لهيعة بعد هشيم، قيل له إن الناس يقولون: احترق كتب ابن لهيعة، فقال: ما غاب له كتاب
يحيى بن سعيد القطان: قال لي بشر بن السري: لو رأيت ابن لهيعة لم تحمل عنه حرفا
يحيى بن عبد الله بن بكير: احترق منزل ابن لهيعة وكتبه في سنة سبعين ومائة
يحيى بن معين: يكتب عنه ما كان قبل احتراق كتبه، ومرة قال: ضعيف الحديث، لا يحتج بحديثه، ومرة: في حديثه كله ليس بشيء، ليس حديثه بذلك القوى، ومرة: ضعيف في حديثه كله لا في بعضه، ومرة: قال أبو الأسود وكان ثقة: ما اختلط ابن لهيعة قط حتى مات