Abu Ahmad al-Hakim: He is not that strong or reliable
Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: His hadith is written
Abu Bakr al-Bayhaqi: He was not a hafiz (memorizer of hadith), and scholars of hadith differ on the permissibility of using his hadith as evidence
Abu Ja'far al-'Aqili: There is something in his memorization
Abu Hatim al-Razi: His hadith is lenient, not strong, and he is not among those whose hadith is used as evidence. His hadith is written down
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: One of the leaders of the Muslims, from the jurists and reciters of the Ahl al-Bayt, except that he had a poor memory. He used to narrate from delusion, so he would bring the narration contrary to its original form. When that became common in his narrations, it became obligatory to avoid them and argue against them
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: His weakness
Abu Zur'a al-Razi: He differs from him in the chains of narration
Abu 'Abdullah al-Hakim al-Naysaburi: 'Umar said, 'His memorization was bad, so he narrated based on guesswork.' And once he said: 'He is upright in hadith.' He mentioned him in al-Mustadrak. He is considered trustworthy and reliable by the early scholars
Abu 'Isa al-Tirmidhi: Truthful, and some scholars have criticized his memory
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: He uses his hadith as evidence, and he once said: 'His hadith is rejected'
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasa'i: Weak
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Jili: His hadith is acceptable
Ibrahim ibn Ya'qub al-Jawzajani: He generally paused regarding most of what he narrates, as it is strange
Ishaq ibn Rahawayh: He uses his hadith as evidence
Ibn Abi Hatim al-Razi: His hadith is lenient, not strong, and he is not among those whose hadith is used as evidence. His hadith is written down. He narrated from Jabir, Ibn 'Umar, Anas ibn Malik, and Tufayl ibn Abi. Al-Thawri, Ibn 'Uyainah, Za'idah, Sharik, and Zuhayr ibn Muhammad narrated from him
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Truthful in his hadith, lenient. It is said: He changed towards the end of his life. He said in al-Talkhis al-Habir: 'His memorization was bad, his hadith is suitable for corroboration, so when he narrates alone it is good, but when he contradicts, it is not accepted
Ibn 'Abd al-Barr al-Andalusi: More trustworthy than all those who criticized him
Al-Khatib al-Baghdadi: His memorization was bad
Al-Daraqutni: He is not strong. And once he said: 'Weak'
Zakariya ibn Yahya al-Saji: One of the people of truth, but he was not precise in hadith
Sufyan ibn 'Uyainah: Four from the Quraysh whose hadith is not accepted, and he counted him among them. And once he said: 'He changed.' And once he said: 'There was something in his memorization, so I disliked meeting him
Abbas ibn Muhammad al-Dawri: Weak in every aspect
'Abd al-Rahman ibn al-Hakam al-Zaghbaani: Good, virtuous, and he described him as being devoted to worship. He said that if they said anything about him, it was regarding his memorization
'Abd al-Rahman ibn Yusuf ibn Kharash: People criticized him
Ali ibn al-Madini: He was weak
'Amr ibn 'Ali al-Fallas: People differed regarding him
Malik ibn Anas: He considered him weak, and did not narrate from him
Muhammad ibn Ishaq ibn Khuzaymah: I do not use him as evidence due to his poor memorization
Muhammad ibn Isma'il al-Bukhari: His hadith is close
Muhammad ibn Sa'd, the scribe of al-Waqidi: His hadith is rejected. They do not use his hadith as evidence, and he was very knowledgeable
Authors of Tahrir Taqrib al-Tahdhib: Weak, but he is considered. No one has a good opinion of him except al-Tirmidhi and his teacher al-Bukhari
Yahya ibn Sa'id al-Qattan: He considered him weak, and did not narrate from him
Yahya ibn Ma'in: His hadith is not used as evidence. In the narration of Abbas ibn Muhammad al-Dawri: 'Weak in every aspect.' And once he said: 'He is not like that.' And in the narration of Ibn Mahriz from him, it was said to him: 'Who is more beloved to you, Khalid ibn Dhakwan or 'Abdullah ibn Muhammad ibn 'Aqil?' He said: ''Abdullah is a destroyer, but there is nothing wrong with him
Ya'qub ibn Shaybah al-Sadusi: Truthful, but there is extreme weakness in his hadith