Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: His hadiths are not many, and the amount of hadiths he narrates is not supported by others.
Abu Bakr al-Bayhaqi: Weak
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He was prone to many errors in narrations, to the extent that he would narrate from trustworthy narrators things that did not resemble the speech of the trustworthy. So, if the hadith scholars heard it from him, they would testify that it was inverted. Therefore, it became necessary to refrain from narrating from him when seeking evidence, and he deserved to be abandoned.
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: Weak
Abu Zur'a al-Razi: Not strong
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: Weak in Hadith, not reliable. And once: Acceptable in Hadith
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasa'i: Weak
Ibn Abi Hatim al-Razi: Not strong, his hadiths are written down. He narrated from Mujahid, Ibn Sabit, and Sa'id ibn Jubayr. Sufyan al-Thawri, 'Isa ibn Yunus, Abdullah ibn Numayr, Abu 'Asim al-Nabil, and Ibrahim ibn Hamid narrated from him.
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Weak
al-Daraqutni: Not strong
al-Dhahabi: Weak
Ali ibn al-Madini: He was weak, weak, and he was from Mecca
Amr ibn Ali al-Fallas: Yahya and 'Abd al-Rahman would not narrate from Abdullah ibn Muslim ibn Hurmuz. Al-Thawri narrated from him. Weak, not reliable.
Yahya ibn Ma'in: In the narration of al-'Abbas ibn Muhammad al-Dawri: Weak. And once: Weak, his hadith is not considered reliable. He used to elevate things that should not be elevated.
Ya'qub ibn Sufyan al-Faswi: Weak. And once: He is alright.