Abu al-Qasim ibn Bashkuwal: Makki, criticized for weakness
Abu Hatim al-Razi: Not strong, his hadith is written
Abu Hatim ibn Habban al-Busti: Abandoned, not strong
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: Trustworthy, a proponent of irjaa
Abu Abd Allah al-Hakim al-Nishapuri: Among those who were silent about him
Abu Ya'la al-Khalili: Good, a hadith scholar, son of a hadith scholar, one does not rely on the likes of him, but he makes mistakes
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: Trustworthy, exaggerated in irjaa
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasa'i: Trustworthy, and once: There is no harm in him
Ibn Abi Hatim al-Razi: Narrated from Ma'mar and Ibn Juraij, and al-Hamidi used to criticize him
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Truthful, makes mistakes, and he was a Murji'i. Ibn Hibban went too far and said: Abandoned
Al-Daraqutni: Mentioned in the hadith of Ibn Juraij, and once he said: He is not relied upon, he is considered, and his father was also lenient, and the son is mentioned
Abd Allah ibn Ahmad ibn Hanbal: There is no harm in him
Abd Allah ibn al-Zubayr al-Humaydi: Criticized him
Muhammad ibn Isma'il al-Bukhari: He believes in irjaa, it is narrated from him, there is some disagreement in his hadith, I do not know of him except five authentic hadiths
Muhammad ibn Sa'd, the scribe of al-Waqidi: A Murji'i, weak
Authors of Tahrir Taqrib al-Tahdhib: Trustworthy, he made mistakes in hadiths as people make mistakes, but he was criticized for irjaa, so some weakened him because of that
Yahya ibn Sa'id al-Qattan: Liar
Yahya ibn Ma'in: Trustworthy, there is no harm in him, the most knowledgeable of people about the hadith of Ibn Juraij, and once: He was truthful
Ya'qub ibn Sufyan al-Faswi: An obstinate, inveterate liar