Abu Bakr al-Bayhaqi: What contradicts the trustworthy narrators is not accepted from him
Abu Hatim al-Razi: Trustworthy, Truthful
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He considered him trustworthy and said: He may have made mistakes
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: Trustworthy, he makes mistakes
Abu Isa al-Tirmidhi: Trustworthy according to the scholars
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: Trustworthy, he makes mistakes, and once: His hadith is Munkar (rejected), and once: He was among the most knowledgeable of the people of Kufa, and once: Trustworthy
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasai: Trustworthy
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Jili: Kufi, trustworthy, and once: Trustworthy, firm in hadith
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Truthful, he has some mistakes
Al-Khatib al-Baghdadi: He was among the most knowledgeable of the people of Kufa, except that he narrated some weak hadiths from Ata, and because of that, Shu'ba criticized him. I say: Shu'ba made a mistake in his choice when he narrated from Muhammad ibn Ubayd Allah al-Arzami and abandoned narrating from Abd al-Malik ibn Abi Sulayman because the Imams of the people of Hadith did not disagree on the weakness of Muhammad ibn Ubayd Allah's hadith and the dropping of his narration
Al-Daraqutni: Trustworthy
Sufyan al-Thawri: The Hadith memorizers are six, and he mentioned him among them, and once: Trustworthy, precise, jurist, and once: One of the scales of Kufa, and he counted him among them, and once: That is the scale
Shu'ba ibn al-Hajjaj: He was asked: You narrate from Muhammad ibn Ubayd Allah al-Arzami and you leave Abd al-Malik, even though he was good in hadith? He said: Because of its goodness, I fled
Salih ibn Ahmad al-Hamadani: Shu'ba used to marvel at the memorization of Abd al-Malik, meaning ibn Abi Sulayman
Abd al-Rahman ibn Yusuf ibn Kharash: Trustworthy
Muhammad ibn Sa'd Katb al-Waqidi: Trustworthy, reliable, firm
Muhammad ibn Abd Allah al-Makhrami: Trustworthy
Muhammad ibn Abd Allah ibn Numayr: Trustworthy
Muhammad ibn Ammar al-Mawsili: Trustworthy, Hafez
The authors of Tahrir Taqrib al-Tahdhib: Trustworthy, the Imams have declared him trustworthy, and Shu'ba criticized him for one hadith, and al-Khatib al-Baghdadi refuted him, and said: Shu'ba made a mistake in this
Yahya ibn Ma'in: He narrated a hadith that no one narrated before him, so people denounced him for it, but Abd al-Malik is trustworthy, truthful, one does not reject someone like him, and once: Trustworthy, and once: Weak, and he is more reliable in narrating from Ata than Qays ibn Sa'd
Ya'qub ibn Sufyan al-Faswi: Trustworthy, precise