Abu al-Hasan ibn al-Qattan al-Fasi: Trustworthy
Abu Bakr al-Bayhaqi: Among the trustworthy narrators whose unique narrations are accepted
Abu Hatim al-Razi: Trustworthy
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: Trustworthy
Abu Zar'a al-Razi: Trustworthy
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasa'i: There is nothing wrong with him
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Jili: Trustworthy
Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani: Trustworthy, but there is some discussion about his narrations from al-A'mash alone. Once he said: al-Basri, some people criticized his memorization, but they all praised his book. The statement of Ibn al-Madini is not a criticism because he was the author of a book and the group relied on him. He mentioned him in al-Matalib al-'Aliya. He is not strong.
Ibn 'Abd al-Barr al-Andalusi: There is no disagreement among them that he is trustworthy and established
al-Daraqutni: In the questions of Abu 'Abd al-Rahman al-Sulami, he said: Trustworthy and reliable
Sulayman ibn Dawud al-Tayalisi: He used to send me hadiths that al-A'mash used to send, and he delivered them all
Ali ibn al-Madini: I never saw him seeking hadith, and I used to remind him of the hadith of al-A'mash, but he did not know a single letter of it
Muhammad ibn Sa'd, the author of al-Waqidi: Trustworthy
The authors of Tahrir Taqrib al-Tahdhib: Trustworthy, and his saying: 'There is some discussion about his narrations from al-A'mash alone' needs further consideration
Yahya ibn Ma'in: Trustworthy, and once: He is nothing
Ya'qub ibn Sufyan al-Fasawi: Trustworthy