Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: There is nothing wrong with his hadith
Abu al-Qasim ibn Bashkuwal: Acceptable hadith, and he has a munkar narration from al-Zahri
Abu Bakr al-Bayhaqi: Trustworthy, reliable
Abu Ja'far al-Tahawi: Trustworthy
Abu Hatim al-Razi: His hadith is written but not used as evidence
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He makes mistakes
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: Acceptable, except that Yahya, meaning Ibn Sa'id, abandoned him at the end
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: Weak, Yahya ibn Sa'id abandoned him at the end
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasai: Not strong
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Jili: Trustworthy
Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani: Truthful, he makes mistakes, once: he is disputed and al-Bukhari suspended judgment on him slightly
Al-Dhahabi: He mentioned him among those he spoke about and he is documented, and he said: Truthful, good in hadith, and it seems that he is trustworthy, and al-Nasai said: Not strong
Abdullah ibn Ahmad ibn Hanbal: He is nothing, if you examine his hadith you will know the munkar in it, and he narrated munkar hadiths from Nafi
Uthman ibn Sa'id al-Darimi: There is nothing wrong with him
Ali ibn al-Madini: He was considered trustworthy by us
Muhammad ibn Abdullah ibn Numayr: Famous
Yahya ibn Sa'id al-Qattan: Bear witness that I have abandoned his hadith, and once: He is weak
Yahya ibn Ma'in: There is nothing wrong with him, and once: Trustworthy, acceptable, and once: Trustworthy, a proof, and once: They criticized him for some hadiths