Abu Ahmad al-Hakim: He is not strong according to them
Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: I did not see anything wrong with him
Abu Hatim al-Razi: He weakened him, he was bad at memorization, very delusional, he was not pious in the way that he accepts what he narrated alone. And once: He is not strong
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: His hadiths are rejected
Abu Abd Allah al-Hakim al-Naysaburi: From the trustworthy
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: There is nothing wrong with him
Ahmad ibn Shuayb al-Nasai: He is not strong, and once: There is nothing wrong with him, and a third time: He is not trustworthy
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Jili: Trustworthy
Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani: He is not strong
al-Daraqutni: Trustworthy
al-Dhahabi: He considered him trustworthy
Muhammad ibn Ismail al-Bukhari: He weakened him
Authors of Tahrir Taqrib al-Tahdhib: Weak but considered in follow-ups and corroborations
Yahya ibn Sa'id al-Qattan: He was broad (in his knowledge), he was not like that
Yahya ibn Ma'in: There is nothing wrong with him, and once: Weak