Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: Despite his weakness, his hadith is written down
Abu Bakr al-Bayhaqi: Weak, his narration is not permissible. He quoted Abu Dawud al-Sijistani as saying: Weak
Abu Hatim al-Razi: Weak narrator
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He became confused at the end of his life, so it is not permissible to argue with his narrations
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: Weak
Abu Zur'ah al-Razi: Not that strong
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: People abandoned his hadith
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasa'i: Weak and he had changed. And once: He is not trustworthy
Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani: Weak and he became confused at the end of his life
al-Darqutni: Weak and once: No argument can be based on his narration
Zakariya ibn Yahya al-Saji: Truthful, but bad memory. He is considered weak, and Ibn al-Mubarak forbade narrating from him
Sibtah ibn al-'Ajami: He mentioned him in al-Ightibat among the trustworthy narrators who became confused
Shu'bah ibn al-Hajjaj: He said: He narrated to me before he changed. Sibtah ibn al-'Ajami said: It appears that he meant by his change that he became confused. And he may have meant that his memory deteriorated
Amr ibn Ali al-Fallas: Bad hadith, abandoned narrator
Muhammad ibn Ishaq ibn Khuzaymah: It is not permissible to argue with his narration
Muhammad ibn Isma'il al-Bukhari: Few hadiths
Yahya ibn Sa'id al-Qattan: He had a bad memory, blind, and abandoned narrator
Yahya ibn Ma'in: Weak, and once: He is nothing
Ya'qub ibn Sufyan al-Faswi: His hadith is worth nothing