Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: He is fine
Abu Ismail al-Ansari: The man is truthful
Abu Hatim al-Razi: Trustworthy, his narrations are accepted if narrated by trustworthy narrators
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: Trustworthy, and once: He was among the scholars of his time in Quran and jurisprudence
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: His narrations are accepted, and once: His hadiths are inconsistent, and once: Trustworthy
Ahmad ibn Shuayb al-Nasa'i: Trustworthy
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Jili: Trustworthy
Ayyub ibn Abi Tamima al-Sakhtiyani: Trustworthy, and once: As for me, I did not accuse him
Ishaq ibn Rahawayh: His narrations are accepted
Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani: Trustworthy, a proven scholar of Tafsir, his criticism of Ibn Umar is not proven, nor is any innovation attributed to him
Al-Dhahabi: Trustworthy but he was an Ibadi
Jabir ibn Zayd Abu al-Sha'tha: The most knowledgeable of people
Abd al-Rahman ibn Muhammad ibn Mundah al-Asbahani: A nation of the Tabi'een, more than seventy of their best, considered him just
Muhammad ibn Ismail al-Bukhari: There is no one among our companions except that he accepts his narrations, and he heard from Abu Hurairah, and narrated from him: Awam ibn Hawshab
Muhammad ibn Sa'd Katb al-Waqidi: Abundant in hadith and knowledge, a sea of seas, his hadiths are not accepted and people criticize him
Muhammad ibn Abd al-Rahman ibn Abi Dhi'b: Not trustworthy, and once: Trustworthy
Mus'ab ibn Abdullah al-Zubayri: He holds the opinion of the Kharijites
Yahya ibn Sa'id al-Ansari: A liar
Yahya ibn Ma'in: Trustworthy, and once: He leans towards the opinion of the Shiites