Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: He is fine in my opinion, among those whose hadiths are written
Abu Hatim al-Razi: His hadith is written but not used as evidence, he is not strong
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: Not like that
Abu Zar'ah al-Razi: He is fine
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: A trustworthy Sheikh, there is nothing wrong with him, and once: He narrates from Anas hadiths that are munkar (rejected)
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Jili: Trustworthy
Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani: Saduq (truthful) with many errors
al-Daraqutni: Weak but considered
Zakariya ibn Yahya al-Saji: There is weakness in him, he is not anything, and he is not strong in hadith
Ali ibn al-Madini: Yahya al-Qattan narrated hadiths from him
Muhammad ibn Isma'il al-Bukhari: He may be confused in his hadith
Muhammad ibn 'Ammar al-Mawsili: Weak
Authors of Tahrir Taqrib al-Tahdhib: Weak but considered in corroborations and supporting evidences
Yahya ibn Ma'in: Salih (righteous)
Yaqub ibn Sufyan al-Faswi: Trustworthy