Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: Good speech, no problem with him
Abu Hatim al-Razi: Righteous, truthful, not that strong, his hadith is written, but not used as evidence
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He considered him trustworthy
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: Righteous, trustworthy
Ahmad ibn Shuayb al-Nasa'i: Not strong in hadith
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Jili: No problem with him
Ibrahim ibn Ya'qub al-Jawzajani: He weakened him, and once said: He is not strong in hadith
Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani: Truthful, makes mistakes
Zuhayr ibn Harb al-Nasa'i: Righteous
Shuba ibn al-Hajjaj: He weakened him and abandoned him
Abd al-Rahman ibn Mahdi: His hadiths are weak
Ali ibn al-Madini: He weakened him, and once said: He is not that strong
Muhammad ibn Ishaq ibn Khuzayma: He weakened him, and once said: His hadith is not used as evidence
Muhammad ibn Ismail al-Bukhari: Truthful, except that he contradicts some of his hadiths
Muhammad ibn Sa'd Katb al-Waqidi: Many hadiths, but his hadith is not used as evidence
Muhammad ibn Abd Allah ibn al-Barqi: Most scholars of hadith consider him trustworthy
Authors of Tahrir Taqrib al-Tahdhib: Weak, but considered in corroborations and supporting evidence
Yahya ibn Sa'id al-Qattan: Weak
Yahya ibn Ma'in: No problem with him, and once said: Weak in hadith