Abu Ahmad al-Hakim: Not strong according to them
Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: Companion of Ali ibn Abi Talib, narrates from him hadiths that are not generally preserved. What he narrates from Ali, no one follows him on it. He is between weak, and if a trustworthy person narrates from him, then in my opinion there is no problem in narrating it. But the denial came from the one who narrated from him because the narrator from him might be weak
Abu al-Faraj ibn al-Jawzi: He mentioned him in his topics with a hadith, then commented on it that it is not authentic
Abu Bakr al-Bazzar: Most of his hadiths from Ali are not narrated by anyone else
Abu Bakr ibn Ayash: Liar
Abu Ja'far al-'Uqayli: He used to believe in the return
Abu Hatim al-Razi: Soft in hadith
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He brought calamities in the narrations, so he deserved to be abandoned because of them
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: It reached me that he is not trustworthy
Abu Nu'aym al-Asbahani: Liar
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasa'i: Abandoned in hadith, and once: He is not trustworthy
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Jili: Trustworthy
Ibrahim ibn Ya'qub al-Jawzajani: Deviant
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Abandoned, accused of rejection
Ibn 'Iraq: Liar
al-Daraqutni: Rejector of hadith
al-Dhahabi: They abandoned him
al-Mughirah ibn Miqsam ad-Dabi: He didn't care about his hadith
Zakariya ibn Yahya al-Saji: Rejector of hadith
Sibṭ ibn al-'Ajami: Liar, abandoned
Abd al-Rahman ibn Mahdi: Abandoned him
Muhammad ibn Sa'd, the scribe of al-Waqidi: He was a Shiite, and he was weak in his narration
Muhammad ibn 'Umar al-Mawsili: Weak
Yahya ibn Sa'id al-Qattan: Abandoned him
Yahya ibn Ma'in: He is not equal to anything, and once: He is not trustworthy, and once: He is nothing, and once: His hadith is nothing