Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: He is alright
Abu al-Fath al-Azdi: Saduq (truthful) but he makes mistakes
Abu Ja'far al-Tahawi: He spoke in his narration without dropping
Abu Hatim al-Razi: He is alright
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He may have made a mistake, his hadith is considered to be from the narration of the trustworthy from him
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: He is not that (reliable)
Abu Zar'a al-Razi: Thiqah (trustworthy)
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: He is alright
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasai: He is not strong
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Jili: Thiqah (trustworthy), his hadith about the animal is denounced
Ibrahim ibn Ya'qub al-Jawzajani: His hadith is mudtarib (confused)
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Thiqah (trustworthy) but may have erred
Ibn Abd al-Barr al-Andalusi: He is alright, al-Bukhari and others narrated from him
Al-Daraqutni: He is alright
Al-Dhahabi: His hadith is good, reaching the high rank of sahih, and once: Saduq (truthful)
Zakariya ibn Yahya al-Saji: Saduq (truthful) but he makes mistakes
Uthman ibn Sa'id al-Darimi: He weakened a hadith because of him
Malik ibn Anas: He used to consider him weak
Muhammad ibn Isma'il al-Bukhari: There is some consideration in his hadith, and once: Saduq (truthful), but he narrated from Ikrima the most, and he did not mention in any of his hadiths that he heard from Ikrima, and once: I don't know if he heard from Ikrima or not
Muhammad ibn Isma'il ibn Khalfun al-Azdi: In the third class of narrators, except that there is some denial in his hadith about Ikrima, and his hearing from Anas is sahih (authentic)
Muhammad ibn Sa'd Kathir al-Waqidi: He narrated many hadiths, and had mursal (hadiths)
Yahya ibn Ma'in: There is weakness in his hadith, he is not strong, and there is no proof in him, and once: His hadith is not used as proof, and once: He is alright