Abu Hatim al-Razi: Trustworthy from the worshippers, one of the best narrators of the generation of Shubah in Hadith
Abu Hatim ibn Habban al-Busti: He may have made mistakes, but his mistakes were not so many that he would be considered to be deviating from the path of the just. However, he narrated some things that are inevitable for humans. People are not infallible, and no one is completely free from mistakes. Whoever finds such mistakes in a narrator, if they are not excessive, then he should not be discredited. If they are excessive, then he deserves to be considered weak at that time.
Abu Abd Allah al-Hakim al-Naysaburi: Bad memory
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: A righteous man, and once: Trustworthy and reliable, we searched for what was said about him, but we did not find any basis for it
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Jili: Weak, not reliable
Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani: Trustworthy and excellent, but he has some mistakes. And once: Al-Bukhari did not narrate from him in his Sahih except two Hadiths as supporting narrations, and he did not narrate from him as a primary source
Al-Daraqutni: Truthful, but prone to mistakes
Al-Dhahabi: He has some issues
Zakariya ibn Yahya al-Saji: Truthful, from the people of Quran and Jihad
Sulaiman ibn Harb al-Azdi: He narrated something that they did not have, so they rejected him
Uffan ibn Muslim al-Saffar: He considered him acceptable
Ali ibn al-Madini: He ordered to abandon his Hadith, and once: His Hadith is gone
Muhammad ibn Sa'd, the scribe of al-Waqidi: Trustworthy, narrated many Hadiths from Shubah
Muhammad ibn Ammar al-Mawsili: Not reliable
Authors of Tahrir Taqrib al-Tahdhib: Trustworthy, his saying: He has some mistakes, it would have been better if he had not mentioned it
Yahya ibn Sa'id al-Qattan: He does not consider him acceptable
Yahya ibn Ma'in: Trustworthy and reliable, a person of conquest, Quran and virtue