Abu Ahmad al-Hakim: He is not strong according to them
Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: He has strange and beautiful hadiths, and if he narrates from a trustworthy person, then his hadith is good, and if he narrates from a weak person, there might be some denial in it, and he is truthful, God willing
Abu Hatim al-Razi: Lenient in hadith, his hadith is written
Abu Hatim ibn Habban al-Busti: He was among those who used to reverse chains of narration and narrate from trustworthy narrators what does not resemble their authentic hadiths, it is not permissible to use his narration as evidence
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: Truthful, but he was not a hadith scholar
Ahmad ibn Shuayb al-Nasa'i: He is not strong
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Lenient in hadith, Ibn Hibban went too far in criticizing him
Muhammad ibn Isma'il al-Bukhari: He needs further consideration, and once: Close to being acceptable in hadith
Muhammad ibn Sa'd Katb al-Waqidi: Truthful, but he makes many mistakes
Muslim ibn al-Hajjaj al-Naysaburi: Weak in hadith
Yahya ibn Ma'in: There was nothing wrong with him, and in a narration of Ibn Mahraz from him, he said: We have heard from him