Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: He has authentic hadiths, people have narrated from him, and his hadiths are generally upright, and I hope that there is nothing wrong with him
Abu Hatim al-Razi: Trustworthy, truthful, good in hadith
Abu Hatim ibn Habban al-Busti: He used to narrate strange things from the famous, I don't like to cite his hadith except in what agrees with the trustworthy
Abu Zur'a al-Razi: An important Sheikh
Abu Abd Allah al-Hakim al-Naysaburi: Trustworthy
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: Not strong in hadith, and once: Good in hadith
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasa'i: Not strong
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Jalili: Not strong
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Truthful, bad memory especially from Mughira
Ibn 'Abd al-Barr al-Andalusi: Considered trustworthy, knowledgeable in the interpretation of the Quran
Zakariya ibn Yahya al-Saji: Truthful, not pious
Abd al-Rahman ibn Yusuf ibn Kharash: Bad memory, truthful
Ali ibn al-Madini: He is like Musa ibn Ubaydah, he mixes up what he narrated from Mughira and the like, and he mentioned him in the questions of Uthman ibn Muhammad ibn Abi Shaybah, and said: He was trustworthy with us
Amr ibn Ali al-Fallas: There is weakness in him, he is truthful, bad memory
Muhammad ibn Sa'd Katib al-Waqidi: Trustworthy
Muhammad ibn 'Ammar al-Mawsili: Trustworthy
Yahya ibn Ma'in: Trustworthy, and once: His hadith is written down but he makes mistakes, and once: Good, and once: Trustworthy, he makes mistakes in what he narrates from Mughira, and once: He mixes things up