Abu Ja'far al-'Uqayli: His hadiths are not followed
Abu Hatim al-Razi: He is fine, his hadiths resemble the hadiths of the truthful, there is nothing wrong with his hadiths
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He narrates unique and unusual hadiths from Anas and narrates from him what does not resemble his hadiths as if he was fabricating hadiths from the sons of Ibn Abi 'Ayyash, and Yazid al-Raqashi narrates from him. It is not permissible to rely on his knowledge, but if what he narrates agrees with the trustworthy narrators, then there is no harm
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: He is fine, his hadiths are upright, and once: Trustworthy
Abu 'Abd Allah al-Hakim al-Naysaburi: Truthful
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: Trustworthy sheikh, and once: There is nothing wrong with him
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasai: There is nothing wrong with him
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Truthful, Ibn Hibban went too far in criticizing him, and the blame for what he criticized in his hadiths lies with others
al-Daraqutni: Trustworthy
al-Dhahabi: Trustworthy
Authors of Tahrir Taqrib al-Tahdhib: Trustworthy, only al-'Uqayli weakened him, and al-Bukhari cited him in al-Sahih
Yahya ibn Ma'in: There is nothing wrong with him, and once: Trustworthy
Ya'qub ibn Sufyan al-Faswi: Trustworthy