Abu Ahmad al-Hakim: Rejector of Hadith, and once: Weak
Abu Hatim al-Razi: Not strong in Hadith
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He was forgetful and had a poor memory, so he would raise the chains of narration without knowing and support the suspended (narrations) without understanding, so the argument based on him is invalid
Abu Hafs Umar ibn Shahin: My opinion of him is the same as that of Ahmad ibn Hanbal
Abu Zur'a al-Razi: Weakened him
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: A righteous man, not strong in Hadith, he was not a narrator of Hadith, and once: He narrated some Munkar (rejected) Hadiths, and once: He is not trustworthy
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasa'i: Weak
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Jalil: He is okay, a righteous man
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Misri: Not trustworthy
Ayyub ibn Abi Tamima al-Sakhtiyani: He is nothing, and once: He is not a narrator of Hadith
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Truthful worshiper, but he is lenient in Hadith, prone to many mistakes
Al-Daraqutni: One of the Zahid (ascetics), and he mentioned him among the weak narrators
Zakaria ibn Yahya al-Saji: He was disputed, and he is not an authority in rulings and Sunnah
Abdullah ibn Dawud al-Khuraibi: He was a righteous man, but others are more reliable than him
Ali ibn al-Madini: Weak, he was not trustworthy
Muhammad ibn Isma'il al-Bukhari: There are Munkar (rejected) Hadiths in his narration, very rejecting of Hadith, he is nothing
Muhammad ibn Sa'd Kathir al-Waqidi: Weak, rejector of Hadith
Authors of Tahrir Taqrib al-Tahdhib: Weak
Yahya ibn Sa'id al-Qattan: I don't like narrating from him
Yahya ibn Ma'in: Not that good, and once: Trustworthy, and once: He is okay
Ya'qub ibn Shaybah al-Sudosi: A righteous man, very weak in Hadith