Abu Ahmad al-Hakim: Not solid
Abu Ahmad ibn 'Adi al-Jurjani: He is fine, he has good and straight Hadiths and some strange ones
Abu al-Qasim ibn Bashkuwal: Shaykh
Abu Bakr al-Bayhaqi: According to some Hadith scholars, he is not relied upon
Abu Hatim al-Razi: Not strong
Abu Hafs 'Umar ibn Shahin: This difference of opinion necessitates pausing in considering him
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: He is nothing, and once: His Hadith is not used as evidence, and once: Weak
Abu Zur’ah al-Razi: Weak, and once: Feeble in Hadith
Abu 'Abd Allah al-Hakim al-Naysaburi: The agreement of the two Sheikhs on him strengthens his case
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasa'i: Weak, and once: Not strong, Medanese
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Saduq Kathīr al-Khaṭā', and in al-Fath: Saduq, some of the Imams criticized his memorization, and in Hady al-Sari: al-Bukhari and the people of Sunnah relied on him
al-Daraqutni: There is no problem with him, and once: Trustworthy, difference of opinion regarding him
al-Dhahabi: One of the Imams of knowledge
al-Muzaffar ibn Mudrik: Three whose Hadiths are to be avoided and he mentioned him among them, and once: He is nothing
Zakaria ibn Yahya al-Saji: From the people of truth, he makes mistakes
Ali ibn al-Madini: He and his brother 'Abd al-Hamid are weak
Authors of Tahrir Taqrib al-Tahdhib: Weak, considered in corroborations and supporting narrations, and the two Sheikhs selected the good from his Hadiths
Yahya ibn Ma'in: He is not strong and his Hadith is not used as evidence, and once: Weak and they desire him, and once: How close he is to Abu 'Awis, and once: Weak in Hadith and once: Trustworthy