Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: I hope there is no problem with him
Abu al-Hasan ibn al-Qattan al-Fassi: Weak, and perhaps some abandoned his hadith
Abu Bakr al-Bayhaqi: Not relied upon
Abu Hatim al-Razi: Weak in hadith, do not write down his hadith nor rely on him, and once: He was not strong
Abu Hatim ibn Habban al-Busti: He was alone in narrating from his father what has no basis, perhaps he raised the mursal and supported the mawquf
Abu Hafs Umar ibn Shahin: His hadith must be accepted, because no one criticized or opposed him
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: Not like that, and once: Weak, and once: People narrated from him, people changed about him
Ahmad ibn Shuayb al-Nasai: Not strong
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Jili: There is no problem with him
Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani: He has leniency
al-Daraqutni: Weak, but not abandoned
Jarir ibn Abd al-Hamid al-Dabbi: Qabus perished, Qabus perished, and once: He was not among the good trustworthy narrators, and once: He was not among the good critics
Zakariya ibn Yahya al-Saji: He is not reliable
Abd al-Rahman ibn Mahdi: He criticized his hadith and did not narrate from him
Muhammad ibn Sa'd Katib al-Waqidi: He has weakness, and is not relied upon
Muhammad ibn Abdullah ibn Numayr: He was not worth a date
Yahya ibn Ma'in: Trustworthy, permissible, except that Abu Layla flogged him as a punishment, and once: Weak in hadith, and once: There is no problem with him
Yaqub ibn Sufyan al-Faswi: Trustworthy