Abu Ahmad al-Hakim: He weakened him
Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: The trustworthy narrators narrated from him, and I see no problem with his hadith
Abu Bakr al-Bazzar: Trustworthy
Abu Ja'far al-'Uqayli: Weak, and once: He is not followed in his hadith
Abu Hatim al-Razi: Shaykh
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He makes many mistakes, among those who elevate mursal reports and invert chains of narration. He is not among those whose narrations are accepted as proof. He also mentioned him among the trustworthy and said: He is strange
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: Acceptable, his hadith is written
Abu 'Abdullah al-Hakim al-Naysaburi: He is not considered strong by them, and once: He is Saduq among the Kufans
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Jili: There is nothing wrong with him
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Saduq (truthful) but lenient
al-Daraqutni: There is nothing wrong with him, and once: Trustworthy
al-Dhahabi: Weak
Zakariya ibn Yahya al-Saji: Weak
Uthman ibn Abi Shaybah al-'Absi: Trustworthy, Saduq, but not a proof
Muhammad ibn 'Abdullah ibn Numayr: Trustworthy
Authors of Tahrir Taqrib al-Tahdhib: Weak, but his narrations are considered in cases of corroboration and supporting evidence
Yahya ibn Ma'in: Shaykh, and once: I met him, but he is nothing special, and once: His hadith is nothing special
Ya'qub ibn Sufyan al-Faswi: Weak