Abu Ahmad bin Adi al-Jurjani: He narrated hadiths from him, and said: He has more than what I mentioned, and with all this he is good in hadith, and most of his hadiths are unique to him
Abu Ja'far al-'Uqayli: There is a mistake in his hadith
Abu Hatim al-Razi: He is fine
Abu Hatim bin Habban al-Busti: He makes mistakes, but his mistakes are not so serious that he deserves to be abandoned, nor has he followed the paths of the trustworthy, which do not prevent a human being from following the path of the just, so leaving him alone is to abandon arguing with what he narrated uniquely, and to consider what he did not disagree with the trustworthy, and to argue with what he agreed with the proven
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: He changed before he died, and once: Weak in speech on destiny, and once: Weak
Abu Zar'ah al-Razi: Truthful, in a narration very weak in hadith
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: It was claimed that he did not memorize, he used to memorize for them and denied hadiths from him
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasa'i: There is nothing wrong with him, and once: Weak
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Jalil: He is fine
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Truthful, bad memorization, accused of destiny, and changed before his death
Al-Hasan ibn al-Sabah al-Bazzar: He is not a memorizer
Al-Daraqutni: Weak, and once: Abandoned
Al-Dhahabi: They considered him good
Muhammad bin al-Muzaffar al-Hafiz: He is fine
Authors of Tahrir Taqrib al-Tahdhib: Weak, considered reliable in corroborations and supporting evidence
Yahya ibn Ma'in: There is nothing wrong with him, and once: Basri, weak