Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: His narrations are generally from those who narrated peculiarities and oddities, all of which are possible, and his hadith is written down. I have not seen any criticism of him from the earlier scholars, and there is nothing wrong with him
Abu Bakr al-Bayhaqi: He quoted Ali ibn al-Madini as saying: Trustworthy
Abu Hatim al-Razi: There is nothing wrong with him, trustworthy and righteous, except that he sometimes errs, and once he said: Weak in hadith
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He used to exaggerate in Shi'ism
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: There is nothing wrong with him
Abu Zur'a al-Razi: He rejects hadith, and once he said: Trustworthy, except that he sometimes errs
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: He used to practice Tadlis
Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani: Trustworthy, he sometimes errs, and once he said: One of the Sheikhs of Ahmad ibn Hanbal
Al-Daraqutni: Al-Bukhari cited him as a source
Al-Dhahabi: A famous Sheikh, trustworthy, Ahmad and the people narrated from him
Ali ibn al-Madini: Trustworthy
Yahya ibn Ma'in: Righteous, and once he said: There is nothing wrong with him, and once he said: There was nothing wrong with him, the people of Basra are pleased with him