Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: I did not see anything wrong with his hadith if it was narrated by a trustworthy person, nor did I see any Munkar hadith from him, so I mention it if it was narrated by a trustworthy person.
Abu Ja'far al-'Uqayli: He narrated three hadiths for which we did not find an origin, and al-Waqidi often narrates Munkar hadiths from him, about al-Zuhri and others, and he is the most knowledgeable about him.
Abu Hatim al-Razi: He is not strong, but his hadiths are written.
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He had a poor memory and made many mistakes. He would err in narrations from his uncle and contradict what he narrated from the trustworthy narrators. Therefore, it is not permissible to rely on him if he narrates alone.
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: Trustworthy, I heard Ahmad praise him.
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: He is fine, and once said: 'His hadith is good'.
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasa'i: He is not that strong.
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Truthful, but with some errors.
Zakaria ibn Yahya al-Saji: Truthful, he narrated hadiths from his uncle that no one else narrated.
Ali ibn al-Madini: Weak, not strong, but we write down his hadith.
Muhammad ibn Umar al-Waqidi: He narrated many hadiths, and they are good.
Muhammad ibn Yahya al-Dhuhali: He placed him in the second class of al-Zuhri's students.
Yahya ibn Ma'in: He is not that strong, and he once said: 'Weak,' once: 'Good,' and once: 'Muhammad ibn Abdullah, the nephew of al-Zuhri, is more preferable to me than Muhammad ibn Ishaq regarding al-Zuhri'.