Abu Ahmad al-Hakim: His hadith is not reliable
Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: He does not have many hadiths
Abu Ja'far al-'Uqayli: His hadith is not followed
Abu Hatim al-Razi: He is fine
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He is a denier of hadith, it is not permissible to use him as evidence if he agrees with the trustworthy narrators in matters that are correct, so how can he be used if he narrates unique hadiths
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: Trustworthy
Abu Zur'a al-Razi: Lenient
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasa'i: He is a denier of hadith
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Saduq (truthful) but with some mistakes
al-Daraqutni: There is nothing wrong with him
Muhammad ibn Isma'il al-Bukhari: He is a denier of hadith
Authors of Tahrir Taqrib al-Tahdhib: Weak, there is disagreement about him, perhaps al-Bukhari, al-Nasa'i, Ibn Hibban, and Abu Zur'a knew something that others did not, so they weakened him. Therefore, it is better to err on the side of caution and consider him weak
Yahya ibn Ma'in: Trustworthy