Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: I hope there is nothing wrong with him
Abu al-Qasim al-Tabarani: One of the trustworthy narrators, and everything Malik narrated on the authority of the trustworthy narrator, it is Makhrama
Abu al-Qasim ibn Bashkuwal: Trustworthy, he did not hear from his father
Abu Hatim al-Razi: His hadith is acceptable
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: His hadith is used as evidence, except for what he narrated from his father
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: Trustworthy, he did not hear from his father, but he narrated from his father's book
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasa'i: There is nothing wrong with him
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Misri: One of the trustworthy people
Ismail ibn Abi Uways: If Malik said, 'The trustworthy narrator narrated to me,' then it is Makhrama ibn Bakir
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Truthful, and his narration from his father is strong from his book. Ahmad, Ibn Ma'in, and others said this. Ibn al-Madini said: He heard little from his father
Zakariya ibn Yahya al-Saji: Truthful, but he used to make tadlis
Ali ibn al-Madini: Trustworthy
Malik ibn Anas: Trustworthy
Muhammad ibn Sa'd, the scribe of al-Waqidi: Trustworthy, narrated many hadiths
Authors of Tahrir Taqrib al-Tahdhib: Trustworthy, only Ibn Ma'in weakened him, and he only weakened him - and Allah knows best - because of his narration from his father, and he did not hear from him
Yahya ibn Ma'in: His hadith is weak, and once: His hadith is not worth anything. They say that his hadith from his father is a book, and once: His hadith is weak, it is not worth anything. In the narration of Ibn Mahriz, he said: Do not write down his hadith