Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: He has narrations, and in some of them, he is not followed.
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He was among those who differed from the prominent narrators with mistakes and raised mursal reports from where he did not know, due to the scarcity of his narrations. So when his contradiction to the trustworthy narrators in what he narrated increased, he went beyond the limit of justice to being discredited, and the reliance on him in what he narrated alone ceased. As for what he agreed with the trustworthy narrators, then whoever considers it considers it without relying on him. I see no problem with that.
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: Weak, and once: Salih (acceptable)
Abu Zar'a al-Razi: Thiqah (reliable)
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Saduq (truthful) but sometimes errs
al-Daraqutni: Thiqah (reliable)
al-Dhahabi: There is disagreement about his condition
Hafs ibn 'Umar al-Hawdi: He accused him of lying and abandoned his hadith
Authors of Tahrir Taqrib al-Tahdhib: Weak, his nephew accused him of lying, and he is undoubtedly more knowledgeable of him than others, so discrediting him is more appropriate
Yahya ibn Ma'in: His hadith is not reliable, and once: Marji ibn Raja is weak and Marji ibn Wada' is weak, except that Marji ibn Raja's hadith is acceptable
Ya'qub ibn Sufyan al-Faswi: He is fine