Abu Ahmad al-Hakim: There is some inconsistency in his narration.
Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: There is some inconsistency in his narration, but I did not find anything objectionable in the rest of his narrations, and he is among those whose narrations are written down.
Abu Bakr al-Bayhaqi: Weak
Abu Hatim al-Razi: He is fine, a righteous sheikh whose hadith is written down but not used as evidence.
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He used to make mistakes.
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: He used to study fiqh, but he was not good at memorizing isnads.
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: He is fine and once said: A righteous, trustworthy man
Ahmad ibn Shuayb al-Nasa'i: Trustworthy
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Masri: A righteous, trustworthy man
Ishaq ibn Yusuf al-Azraq: Sufyan al-Thawri was not more pious than him, and Abu Hanifa was not more knowledgeable in fiqh than him.
Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani: Truthful, but he has some mistakes.
al-Daraqutni: He is considered reliable.
al-Dhahabi: A group considered him trustworthy, and he was lenient.
Muhammad ibn Sa'd Kathib al-Waqidi: Trustworthy
Muslim ibn al-Hajjaj al-Naysaburi: Trustworthy
Authors of Tahrir Taqrib al-Tahdhib: Saduq (truthful) Hasan al-Hadith
Yazid ibn Harun al-Ayli: He could not memorize isnads.