Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: He has strange hadiths, and I hope that he is fine, and what I rejected from him is a mistake from him, not intentional
Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi: Trustworthy Sheikh
Abu Bakr al-Bazzar: Very weak, he has Munkar hadiths, and once: He is not strong, more than one narrated from him, and he is a man from the people of Kufa
Abu Bakr ibn Abi Shaybah: We abandoned his hadith
Abu Hatim al-Razi: Sheikh whose place is truthfulness
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: His papers were overturned, so he would narrate what he heard from this one from that one while he did not know, and what he heard from that one from this one from a point of view that he did not understand, so the argument with all that he narrated from Shubah is invalidated, but rather what he heard from al-Hasan ibn 'Ammarah
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: He is lenient, and once: Lenient
Abu Zar'ah al-Razi: Weak in hadith
Abu Muhammad ibn Hazm al-Zahiri: Weak
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: The hadiths of Yusuf ibn Saheeb, which he made about al-Zubayrqan al-Sirraj, were overturned against him, and he presented Ibn Abi Shaybah, so he began to mention hadiths from him, from Shubah, and al-Hasan ibn 'Ammarah overturned them
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Jalili: Trustworthy
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Truthful, he has some mistakes
Zakariya ibn Yahya al-Saji: Weak, rejected hadith
Ali ibn al-Madini: He weakened him, and said: He was from the Shiites
The authors of Tahrir Taqrib al-Tahdhib: Weak, he is considered in corroborations and supporting evidence
Yahya ibn Ma'in: There is nothing wrong with him, and once: Truthful, and once: Weak