Abu Ahmad bin Adi al-Jurjani: Despite his weakness, his hadith is collected and written
Abu Bakr al-Bazzar: There is nothing wrong with him, and we do not know of anyone who abandoned his hadith
Abu Ja'far al-'Uqayli: He mentioned a hadith for him and said: He is not followed upon with this isnad
Abu Hatim al-Razi: His hadith is acceptable, and once said: His hadith being acceptable is more preferable to me than Uqbah al-Asamm, and than Sulayman bin Musa al-Ashdaq
Abu Hatim bin Hibban al-Busti: He sometimes made mistakes, and was impressed with his own opinion, and once said: He had a bad memory despite the goodness in him
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: He is not an authority, one does not give a verdict based on his hadith if there is a disagreement
Abu Zar'ah al-Razi: Acceptable, as if his matter was lenient, and once said: His narration from Anas is acceptable, mursal, he did not hear from him
Ahmad bin Hanbal: His hadith regarding Ataa is weak
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasa'i: He is not strong
Ahmad bin Salih al-Jalili: Trustworthy, and once said: There is nothing wrong with him
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Trustworthy but makes many mistakes, and his hadith from Ataa is weak
al-Daraqutni: He is not strong
Khalifah bin Khayyat: There is nothing wrong with him
Zakaria bin Yahya al-Saji: Trustworthy, he makes mistakes
Uthman bin Dahiya al-Sabti: He is not worth a penny
Ali ibn al-Madini: He was righteous and moderate, and he was not strong
Muhammad ibn Isma'il al-Bukhari: There is nothing wrong with him, and once said: He is a rejector of hadith
Muhammad bin Sa'd Katb al-Waqidi: There is weakness in his hadith
The authors of Tahrir Taqrib al-Tahdhib: Weak, he is considered in corroborations and witnesses
Yahya bin Sa'id al-Qattan: His hadith from Ataa was weak, and his hadith resembled that of Ibn Abi Layla in terms of bad memory
Yahya bin Ma'in: Acceptable, and once said: Weak in the hadith of Ataa