Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: In his hadith, there are narrations that the trustworthy narrators agree with him on, and there are narrations that they do not agree with him on. His hadith is written among the weak narrators, and some of his narrations are not followed by anyone.
Abu Bakr al-Isma'ili: He is questionable.
Abu Hatim al-Razi: Lenient in Hadith.
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He was of weak memory, made mistakes, and his hadith is avoided from the narration of his son Muhammad ibn Ayyub from him.
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: Weak.
Abu Sa'id ibn Yunus al-Misri: They criticized him.
Abu Ya'la al-Khalili: They did not approve of his memorization.
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: Weak.
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasa'i: He is not trustworthy, and once he mentioned him in al-Sunan al-Sughra and said: "His hadith is abandoned."
Ibrahim ibn Ya'qub al-Jawzajani: His hadith is weak, but he is coherent.
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Truthful, makes mistakes.
Al-Daraqutni: He is considered.
Zakariya ibn Yahya al-Saji: Weak, discard him.
Muhammad ibn Isma'il al-Bukhari: They criticize him.
Muhammad ibn 'Abdullah al-Makhrami: His hadith is abandoned, and once: "Discard him."
Authors of Tahrir Taqrib al-Tahdhib: Weak, so where did his truthfulness come from?
Yahya ibn Ma'in: He is nothing, he steals hadiths, and once: "He used to claim the hadiths of people."