Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: Despite his weakness, his hadith is written
Abu Hatim al-Razi: Abandoned in Hadith
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He was among those who were distinguished from the trustworthy by the inversions and narrated from the trustworthy what does not resemble the hadith of the trustworthy, so when that increased in his narration, the objection to him was dropped
Abu Hafs Umar ibn Shahin: And this statement is acceptable in stopping it, and it is not included in the Sahih
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: Behold, his weakness
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: There was nothing wrong with him, but they criticized him when he narrated from Ibrahim al-Saigh, and once: He is trustworthy, and once: I dare not say that he is a liar
Ahmad ibn Shuayb al-Nasa'i: He is not trustworthy, and his hadith is not written, and once: Abandoned in Hadith, his weakness
Ahmad ibn Asim al-Antaki: We abandoned his hadith after we wrote a lot about him
Ibrahim ibn Ya'qub al-Jawzajani: He is nothing, and once: His hadith is worth nothing
Al-Dhahabi: A group abandoned him
Al-'Abbas ibn Mus'ab al-Marwazi: Weak, and once: He was not trustworthy
Al-Qasim ibn Salam al-Harawi: We abandoned his hadith and he was a righteous man
Zakaria ibn Yahya al-Saji: I heard Salamah ibn Shabib narrate munkar from him
Zuhair ibn Harb al-Nasa'i: Liar
Suwayd ibn Ya'qub al-Talaqani: Weak
Ali ibn al-Madini: His weakness
Muhammad ibn Isma'il al-Bukhari: They accuse him of lying, and once: They remained silent about him
Mahmud ibn Ghaylan al-'Adawi: Ahmad, Ibn Ma'in, and Abu Khaythama struck his hadith and dropped it
Yahya ibn Ma'in: His hadith is nothing, and once: He is not trustworthy, and once: Weak, and in the narration of Ibn Muharriz, he said: A liar, evil, an enemy of God