Abu Ahmad al-Hakim: His hadith is not reliable
Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: Acceptable in the chapter of narration, and his hadith is written despite his weakness
Abu al-Qasim ibn Bashkuwal: He is touched by weakness
Abu Ja'far al-'Uqayli: He has narrations that are not followed, and I don't rely on any of them
Abu Hatim al-Razi: A Sheikh who is not strong, his hadith is written but not used as evidence. He is a denier of hadith, unlike Ibrahim ibn Ismail ibn Majma', and I prefer him over Ibrahim ibn al-Fadl
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He used to change the chains of narrators and elevate mursal narrations
Abu Isa al-Tirmidhi: He is weak in hadith
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: Trustworthy
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasai: Weak, from Medina
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Jalili: Trustworthy
Ibrahim ibn Ishaq al-Harbi: A righteous Sheikh from Medina. He has virtue, but I do not think he is a hafiz
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Weak
al-Daraqutni: Abandoned, and he mentioned him once in the Book of Sunan and said: Weak and not strong
Muhammad ibn Ismail al-Bukhari: Denier of hadith
Muhammad ibn Sa'd, the scribe of al-Waqidi: He was a praying and worshipping man, and he narrated few hadiths
Yahya ibn Ma'in: Acceptable, his hadith is written but not used as evidence, and once: He is nothing