Abu Ahmad al-Hakim: Not considered a حافظ (one who has memorized Hadith) by them
Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: His Hadiths are close (to being accurate) and he is not bad
Abu al-Qasim ibn Bashkuwal: A Sheikh from Ta'if
Abu Bishr al-Dulabi: Not strong (in Hadith)
Abu Hatim al-Razi: A righteous Sheikh, his place is of truthfulness, but he was not a حافظ, one writes down his Hadith but does not use it as proof
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He makes mistakes
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: By Allah, there is something in his Hadith, and it is as if he did not praise him, and once: I came to him and wrote from him something, then I saw him mixing up the Hadiths so I left him, and there is something in him and leniency in his matter, and once: trustworthy
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasa'i: There is no harm in him, and he is Munkar al-Hadith (rejected in Hadith) on the authority of Ubayd Allah ibn Umar, and once: He is not strong
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Jili: Trustworthy
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Saduq (truthful) Sayyi' al-Hifz (poor memory) especially in his narration from Ubayd Allah ibn Umar
al-Daraqutni: Sayyi' al-Hifz (poor memory)
al-Dhahabi: Trustworthy
Zakariya ibn Yahya al-Saji: Saduq (truthful) but he makes mistakes in Hadith, and he made mistakes in Hadiths he narrated from Ubayd Allah ibn Umar
Muhammad ibn Isma'il al-Bukhari: What al-Humaydi narrated from Yahya ibn Sulayman is Sahih (authentic)
Muhammad ibn Sa'd Kathir al-Waqidi: Trustworthy, narrated many Hadiths
Authors of Tahdhib al-Tahdhib: Saduq (truthful) Hasan al-Hadith (good in Hadith), weak in his narration from Ubayd Allah ibn Umar
Yahya ibn Ma'in: There is no harm in him, one writes down his Hadith, and once: trustworthy
Ya'qub ibn Sufyan al-Faswi: Sunni, righteous man, his book is fine and if he narrates from his book then his Hadith is Hasan (good), and if he narrates from memory then you should verify and scrutinize