Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: There is nothing wrong with his hadith
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He exaggerates and sometimes he said: He was among those who narrated unique things that he was not followed on, despite his few narrations, as if he was very careless, and hence the mistakes occurred in his narrations. It is necessary to avoid what he narrated uniquely, and if someone needs to use his narrations, they should use what is agreed upon by the trustworthy narrators. I see nothing wrong with that
Abu Awana al-Isfarayini: Thiqah (trustworthy)
Abu Nasr ibn Makula: He mentioned him in al-Ikmal
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Jili: Thiqah (trustworthy)
Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani: Saduq (truthful) but makes mistakes
Al-Dhahabi: He is not strong
Muhammad ibn Ismail al-Bukhari: They criticize him
Authors of Tahrir Taqrib al-Tahdhib: Da'if (weak), but he can be considered in corroborations and supporting narrations
Yahya ibn Yusuf al-Zami: He authenticated him