Abu Ahmad al-Hakim: He is not considered reliable by them
Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: I hope that there is no problem with him among the Syrians
Abu Hatim al-Razi: Weak in Hadith, Denier of Hadith, and Delusional in Hadith, and once: He was righteous in the beginning of his life, then he became confused before his death, he is nothing
Abu Hatim ibn Habban al-Busti: He was an old man and truthful, except that he became confused at the end of his life, so he used to narrate inverted things. It is not permissible to rely on him if he narrates alone, and in what he agrees with the trustworthy, it is considered from him because of his long-standing truthfulness before his confusion, without relying on him
Abu Mushir al-Ghasani: He was a jurist who was not accused, I fear for him bad memory and delusion
Abu Hisham al-Qadi: His Hadith is nullified
Ahmad ibn Shuayb al-Nasai: Abandoned, and once: He is not trustworthy
Ibrahim ibn Yaqub al-Jawzajani: I fear that his Hadiths are fabricated
Dahim al-Dimashqi: His Hadith is nullified, and once: He was righteous in the beginning of his life, then he became confused before his death
Abd al-A'la ibn Mushir al-Ghasani: He is not accused, but I fear for him bad memory
Muhammad ibn Ismail al-Bukhari: His Hadiths are Munkar (rejected)