Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jarjani: Generally what he narrates is not preserved
Abu Bakr al-Bayhaqi: They spoke about him
Abu Hatim al-Razi: Weak in Hadith, very rejected in Hadith
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He was among those whose memorization was bad, to the extent that he used to narrate reversed narrations from the trustworthy and bring falsehoods from famous people. When this increased in his narrations, the reliance on his narrations was abandoned, even though some considered what agreed with the trustworthy from his narrations without relying on him. I do not see anything wrong with that.
Abu Zar'ah al-Razi: Weak in Hadith, and once: Feeble in Hadith and he was harsh in his words about him
Abu Abd Allah al-Hakim al-Naysaburi: He narrated falsehoods from Suhayl, Sa'id, and Ibn Khuzaymah
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: An old man from the people of Medina, there is nothing wrong with him, and once: Weak in Hadith, and once: He has falsehoods
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasa'i: Abandoned in Hadith, and once: He is not trustworthy
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Masri: His Hadith is worthless
Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani: Weak
Ibn Abd al-Barr al-Andalusi: There is a consensus on his weakening
Al-Dhahabi: Weak
Zakariya ibn Yahya al-Saji: There is weakness in him and he has falsehoods
Abd al-Haqq ibn Abd al-Rahman al-Ishbili: I do not know anyone who considered him trustworthy
Ali ibn al-Madini: I do not narrate anything from him, nor do I narrate anything about him
Malik ibn 'Isa al-Qafsi: Weak
Muhammad ibn Isma'il al-Bukhari: His Hadiths are almost worthless, and he was very weak
Muhammad ibn Sa'd Kathir al-Waqidi: Trustworthy
Yahya ibn Ma'in: Lenient, and once: His Hadith is not like that, and once: There was nothing wrong with him, and once: Weak, and in the narration of Ibn Muharriz, he said: He is worthless