Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: His hadith is passable, it is written in the weak [hadiths]
Abu Bakr al-Bayhaqi: Weak, and he said in al-Sunan al-Kubra: Not strong
Abu Hatim al-Razi: Not strong, his place is truthfulness, his hadith is written but not used as proof
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: Many mistakes, it is preferred to accompany what is unique from narrations, and I do not like relying on what agrees with the established due to the large number of reversed narrations
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: Passable hadith
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: He is fine, and once: There is weakness in him
Ahmad ibn Shuayb al-Nasa'i: The Kufan is not strong, and once: There is no harm in him
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Jili: Permissible hadith
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Truthful, lenient in memorization
al-Daraqutni: They weakened him with an argument, he narrated hadiths that he was not followed on, and once: He is considered
al-Dhahabi: Trustworthy
Zakariya ibn Yahya al-Saji: Truthful, they differed about him
Sufyan al-Thawri: He is fine
Sufyan ibn 'Uyaynah: He weakened him
Shubah ibn al-Hajjaj: He criticized him
Abd al-Rahman ibn Mahdi: He strongly attacked those who weakened him
Muhammad ibn Sa'd كاتب الواقدي: Trustworthy
Authors of Tahrir Taqrib al-Tahdhib: Weak but considered, and we did not find a predecessor for al-Dhahabi's authentication of him
Yahya ibn Sa'id al-Qattan: He was not strong, and once: Weak
Yahya ibn Ma'in: Weak: Ibn Mahdi disliked what he said, and from the route of a man from the people of Baghdad who said: Weak, insignificant
Yaqub ibn Sufyan al-Faswi: He has nobility, and in his hadith is leniency