Abu Ahmad al-Hakim: Trustworthy
Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: Truthful in narration
Abu Bakr al-Bazzar: A man who leans towards Shi'ism, and once: His only fault was his intense Shi'ism, not that it is a fault against him in hearing
Abu Hatim al-Razi: Truthful in hadith, good in hadith, no problem with him, abundant in hadith
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: This is not Isma'il ibn Aban al-Khayyat, that one is weak
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: Trustworthy
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: Trustworthy, and praised him
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasa'i: There is nothing wrong with him
Ahmad ibn Mansur al-Ramadi: Trustworthy
Ibrahim ibn Ya'qub al-Jawzajani: He was inclined away from the truth, but he did not lie in hadith
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Trustworthy, he was criticized for his Shi'ism, once: One of the sheikhs of al-Bukhari and he did not narrate much from him. As for the statement of al-Jawzajani, who is a Nasibi deviated from Ali, it is against the Shi'i deviated from Uthman, and the correct thing is to follow them both and it is not permissible to listen to the statement of an innovator in innovation
Al-Daraqutni: Trustworthy and reliable, and once: Ahmad praised him, but he is not strong, his hadiths are not pure
Al-Dhahabi: Trustworthy
Ja'far ibn Muhammad al-Sa'igh: Trustworthy
Uthman ibn Abi Shaybah al-'Absi: Trustworthy, his hadith is authentic
Ali ibn al-Madini: No problem with him
Muhammad ibn Isma'il al-Bukhari: Truthful
Mattin al-Hadrami: Trustworthy
Yahya ibn Ma'in: Trustworthy
Ya'qub ibn Shaybah al-Sadusi: Trustworthy, and I wrote from him