Abu Ahmad ibn 'Adi al-Jurjani: Good in hadith, his hadith is rare, and he is fine in my opinion
Abu al-Fath al-Azdi: He was of blameworthy opinion, not of sound doctrine, he held the view of the Kharijites, but as for hadith, there was nothing wrong with him in it
Abu Ja'far al-'Uqayli: He was a Bihsi (follower of Bihsism), he held the view of the Kharijites
Abu Hatim al-Razi: Truthful, righteous
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He was a Bihsi, he held the view of the buyers
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: Trustworthy, he was a Bihsi, he held the view of the Kharijites
Abu 'Ali al-Hafiz al-Naysaburi: Trustworthy
Abu Nu'aym al-Fadl ibn Dukayn: Isma'il ibn Sami', a Bihsi, lived near the mosque for forty years, he was not seen in Friday prayer nor in congregation
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: Trustworthy, and once: Righteous
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasa'i: There is nothing wrong with him
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Jalil: Trustworthy
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Truthful, he was criticized for his Kharijite beliefs
Al-Dhahabi: Trustworthy, he had some Kharijite beliefs
Jarir ibn 'Abd al-Hamid al-Dabbi: He held the view of the Kharijites, and I wrote from him then I abandoned him
Za'idah ibn Qudamah al-Thaqafi: Abandoned him because of his doctrine
Zakariya ibn Yahya al-Saji: He was blameworthy in his opinion
Sufyan ibn 'Uyaynah: He was a Bihsi, so I did not go to him nor did I approach him
Muhammad ibn Isma'il al-Bukhari: As for hadith, there was nothing wrong with him in it
Muhammad ibn Sa'd, the scribe of al-Waqidi: Trustworthy, God willing
Muhammad ibn 'Abdullah ibn Numayr: Trustworthy
Muhammad ibn Yahya al-Dhuhali: He was a Bihsi, he was among those who hated 'Ali
The authors of Tahrir Taqrib al-Tahdhib: Trustworthy, Jarir and Za'idah abandoned him because he held the view of the Kharijites, it is an extraneous factor
Yahya ibn Sa'id al-Qattan: There was nothing wrong with him in hadith
Yahya ibn Ma'in: Trustworthy, reliable, and in the narration of Ibn Mahriz: Trustworthy
Ya'qub ibn Sufyan al-Faswi: There is nothing wrong with him