Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jarjani: He narrated strange hadiths from his maternal uncle Malik, which no one followed him on, and from Sulayman ibn Bilal and others of his sheikhs
Abu al-Qasim al-Lalakai: Their words mean that he is weak
Abu Hatim al-Razi: He was a place of truthfulness and was sometimes mistaken, and once: He was firm in his state and once: He was one of the trustworthy
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: He is fine
Ahmad ibn Shuayb al-Nasa'i: Weak and once: He is not trustworthy
Ibn Hajar al-Asqalani: Truthful, he made mistakes in hadiths from his memory, once: He brought out the origins of al-Bukhari and allowed him to choose from them and to teach him what he narrates so that he may narrate it and ignore what is other than it, which indicates that what al-Bukhari narrated from him is from his authentic hadith because he wrote from his origins and based on this, he does not argue with anything from his hadith other than what is in the Sahih because of what may
al-Daraqutni: I do not choose him in the Sahih
al-Dhahabi: Truthful, famous, with some strangeness
al-Nadh'r ibn Salama al-Marwazi: A liar, he used to narrate from Malik on issues of Ibn Wahb
Sayf ibn Muhammad al-Thوري: He used to weaken the hadith
Authors of Tahrir Taqrib al-Tahdhib: Weak but considered, and Ahmad considered the saying about him good because of his praiseworthy stance in the tribulation, and al-Bukhari narrated from him after he presented his origins to him
Yahya ibn Ma'in: He is fine, and once: Truthful, weak-minded, not that much, and once: From the route of Mu'awiya ibn Salih: Abu Uways and his son are weak, and once: Ibn Abi Uways and his father steal hadith, and once: Confused, lies, not worth anything, and once: From the route of Usamah ibn al-Daqqaq: Ibn Abi Uways is worth two fils, and in the narration of Ibn Mahriz, he said: Weak0, the weakest