Abu Bakr al-Bayhaqi: Differed upon in his righteousness
Abu Hatim al-Razi: Not strong, his hadith is written, but not used as evidence
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He was a righteous sheikh who had many concerns, poor memory, to the point that he was excluded from those whose hadiths are considered evidence when they narrate alone, and Muslim was criticized for including his hadith
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: Confused in hadith, and once said: I do not know him
Ahmad ibn Shuayb al-Nasai: Salih, and once said: He is not that strong, he mentioned him among the weak and abandoned narrators
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Saduq (truthful) but makes mistakes
Ibn Abd al-Barr al-Andalusi: Not strong
Al-Dhahabi: Not strong
Zakaria ibn Yahya al-Saji: Truthful but has some munkar (rejected) hadiths
Abd al-Rahman ibn Mahdi: He was one of our sheikhs, and I did not see anything but good from him
Authors of Tahdhib al-Tahdhib: Weak but considered, and I did not find anyone who praised him except Abd al-Rahman ibn Mahdi, and Muslim selected from his hadith what was corroborated
Yahya ibn Ma'in: Weak in hadith