Abu Ahmad ibn Adi al-Jurjani: He has authentic hadiths, and he narrates strange things. He is, in my opinion, one of those who do not intentionally lie, and he is truthful.
Abu al-Faraj ibn al-Jawzi: He weakened him.
Abu Ja'far al-'Uqayli: He has straight and authentic hadiths, and he is, in my opinion, one of those who do not intentionally lie, and he is truthful, as 'Amr ibn 'Ali said. Perhaps these hadiths that were denied from him were misunderstood or confused, so he erred.
Abu Hatim al-Razi: He is not strong in hadith, and he was a righteous sheikh. In some of his hadiths, there is denial.
Abu Hatim ibn Hibban al-Busti: He is one of the worshippers whose prayers are answered in times of need, but he is one of those who neglected the study and memorization of hadith and busied himself with worship instead. So when he narrates, he makes mistakes in what he narrates and reverses the chains of narration without realizing it, so he became one of those whose narrations are not accepted as evidence, even though he was righteous.
Abu Dawud al-Sijistani: He was not good at memorization. And once: Weak, I do not write down his hadith.
Abu Zur'ah al-Razi: He is not strong.
Abu Nu'aym al-Asbahani: He rejected hadith.
Ahmad ibn Hanbal: He weakened him. And once: He abandoned him.
Ahmad ibn Shu'ayb al-Nasa'i: Weak. And once: Abandoned in hadith.
Ahmad ibn Salih al-Jalili: Weak in hadith.
Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani: Weak in hadith, despite his worship and virtue.
Al-Daraqutni: He is not strong in hadith. And once he mentioned him in Al-Sunan and said: Weak.
Al-Dhahabi: They weakened him.
Zakariya ibn Yahya al-Saji: He rejected hadith.
Ali ibn al-Madini: He used to make mistakes in hadith. And once: Very weak, very weak.
Amr ibn Ali al-Fallas: Truthful, he rejected hadith.
Muhammad ibn Isma'il al-Bukhari: He rejected hadith.
Muslim ibn al-Hajjaj al-Naysaburi: One of the best of people.
Yahya ibn Sa'id al-Qattan: He weakened him.
Yahya ibn Ma'in: Nothing.
Ya'qub ibn Sufyan al-Faswi: He weakened him.